I can’t help but feel a mix of disappointment and concern over the unfolding situation between Twitter and The Daily Wire. In the spirit of transparency, I want to provide you with some context before delving into the recent Twitter threads shared by Jeremy, the CEO and founder of The Daily Wire.
Twitter Gets into Fight with The Daily Wire
The story revolves around the negotiations between The Daily Wire and Twitter to allow the premiere or re-premiere of their movie, “What is a Woman,” on the platform. Today, June 1st, marks the first day of Pride Month, and The Daily Wire saw this as an opportunity to celebrate by sharing their movie on Twitter. However, Twitter threw a wrench into their plans.
Twitter decided to disallow the premiere, citing concerns about hate speech and misgendering in the film. They offered an alternative: to censor the movie by limiting its reach and labeling it as “hateful conduct.” The instances of misgendering mentioned include a father referring to his 14-year-old daughter using “her” pronouns and a store owner using the wrong pronoun during a confrontation with a trans person.
Jeremy took to Twitter to express his frustration with the situation, highlighting the back-and-forth between The Daily Wire and Elon Musk, who had recently taken over the platform. The hope was that Musk’s involvement would steer Twitter away from these extreme policies. Unfortunately, it seems that Twitter’s radical left-leaning policies, including misgendering and deadnaming regulations, remain intact.
The Daily Wire was offered chance to edit film
When The Daily Wire raised objections to Twitter’s decision, they were offered the opportunity to edit the film to comply with the platform’s guidelines. However, they declined, standing firm in their belief that Twitter’s policies go against the principles of free speech. The conversation then shifted to Twitter’s “speech not reach” policy, which effectively shadowbanned the content, allowing it to be posted but minimizing its visibility.
Jeremy rightfully questioned how Twitter could claim to support free speech while simultaneously limiting the reach of content and suppressing one side of a crucial societal debate. He mentioned that other tech platforms have already taken similar steps to silence conservative voices, and he hoped that Elon Musk would reconsider this policy, as it undermines Twitter’s commitment to championing free speech.
Planned to share film despite throttling and hateful conduct labels
Despite Twitter’s threats and the ongoing battle, The Daily Wire remained determined to share their movie. They planned to post it anyway, defying the potential throttling and hateful conduct labels promised by Twitter. The outcome of this situation is uncertain at the time of writing, and we eagerly await to see how it unfolds.
It’s disheartening to witness a platform that claims to embrace free speech imposing restrictions and stifling debate. If we can’t engage in these important discussions on Twitter, where can we? The implications extend beyond this specific situation, raising concerns about the future of free expression and diversity of opinions in the digital realm.
As we contemplate this matter, let’s engage in a conversation in the comments section. Feel free to share your thoughts on the situation between Twitter and The Daily Wire. Together, we can explore the challenges facing free speech and its implications for the digital landscape.
If you enjoy our writing, please consider leaving a small donation. Your support helps keep the lights on and allows us to hire more writers and grow our site.