Over the past few weeks, there’s been significant discussion about the idea of eliminating taxes on tips, a proposal that has caught the attention of many, including high-profile figures like Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. Trump has succinctly summed it up as “no tax on tips,” while Harris, during a recent speech in Nevada, echoed the sentiment, advocating for the elimination of taxes on tips for service and hospitality workers.
“No Tax on Tips” being pushed by Donald Trump
At first glance, this proposal might seem like a win for tipped workers, but there’s a growing chorus of opposition from economists and tax experts who argue that it might not be the great idea it appears to be.
One of the primary concerns is the inherent unfairness of such a policy. Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, points out that this policy would create a disparity in the tax system. Why should a waiter benefit from tax-free income while other workers, like dishwashers or retail cashiers, don’t receive the same tax breaks? This unequal treatment could lead to a system where different workers are taxed differently for similar types of income, creating unnecessary complications and potential for exploitation.
Moreover, the policy could be easily gamed. There’s the possibility that professionals, such as corporate lawyers, could start classifying their fees as tips to avoid paying taxes. This could lead to a scenario where high earners exploit a system designed to benefit lower-wage workers, undermining the policy’s original intent. The temptation to redefine income as tips could spread, turning a well-meaning proposal into a loophole that benefits those it wasn’t intended to.
Gleckman and other tax experts are particularly concerned about the broader implications of such a policy. History has shown that when different types of income are taxed differently, people will often find ways to shift their income into the lower-tax category. This happened during World War II when employer-sponsored health insurance became widespread due to favorable tax treatment. Similarly, today’s financial elites often exploit the “carried interest loophole” to pay lower taxes on their income by classifying it as capital gains rather than wages.
Potential to Complicate Tax System Even More
These examples highlight a critical issue: the more complex the tax code becomes with exemptions and special rules, the easier it is to manipulate. While the idea of making tips tax-free might sound like a straightforward way to help workers, it could actually complicate the tax system further, making it more difficult for the government to collect revenue and ensuring that the benefits are unevenly distributed.
Even if the policy were implemented with strict guidelines—such as limiting the tax exemption to lower-income workers or specific industries—it would still be prone to manipulation. Freelancers and other professionals could potentially redefine their work to fit within these guidelines, further exacerbating the issue.
Raise the Federal Tipped Minimum Wage
In the end, Gleckman argues that a more effective way to support tipped workers would be to raise the federal tipped minimum wage, which currently stands at a shockingly low $2.13 per hour in some states. This would provide more consistent financial support to workers without creating the potential for loopholes that could be exploited by others. While Kamala Harris has proposed increasing the minimum wage alongside eliminating taxes on tips, it’s unclear whether this includes raising the tipped minimum wage. Trump’s proposal, on the other hand, does not address the minimum wage at all.
The idea of eliminating taxes on tips is politically popular, with bipartisan support from figures like Senator Ted Cruz and Representative Steven Horsford. Given the importance of tipped workers in states like Nevada, it’s easy to see why politicians are pushing for it. But as appealing as the idea might be on the surface, it’s crucial to consider the potential pitfalls and whether this policy could do more harm than good in the long run. For now, the debate continues, and only time will tell if this proposal will become a reality.
We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. TWL operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.
 |  |  |
